Artificial Sweeteners

Artificial sweeteners are incredibly popular and the reason is simple:  they seem like a fantasy, almost too good to be true.  Take the case of saccharin:  it is about three hundred times as sweet as sugar and yet is zero calories. That's the allure:  we get all the sweetness that we want with no metabolic or weight gain consequences.

Unfortunately, the picture is not so simple.  Artificial sweeteners are not just a little artificial - they are very artifical and produce some very surprising (negative) effects. 

NEW FLASH:  One recent study found cancer-causing properties associated with aspartame and saccharin, two of the three sweeteners discussed below. [8]

Let's start with the three most popular on the market today:

Aspartame, Equal or Nutrasweet

This sweetener is almost synonymous with the word "diet" and is ubiquitous in diet drinks, including Diet Coke and Diet Pepsi.  It is consumed in vast quantities by people around the globe and so it has to be safe, right? Unfortunately, nothing could be further from the truth.

If you haven't heard, aspartame is quickly metabolized by the body and broken down into some nasty chemicals, including methanol, formaldehyde and aspartate, that are already linked to a variety of very serious conditions in both animals and humans:

1.  Excitotoxin Syndrome.  This is a reversible but debilitating condition linked to the nasty excitotoxin, aspartate in Aspartame.  You can read more here in my link on Excitotoxin Syndrome.  I don't know anyone who drinks more than, say, three Diet Cokes or Diet Pepsis that does not struggle with many of these symptoms. (I believe that I struggled with this for several years an you can read about in my link about Personal Fatigue.)

2. Lymphoma and Leukemia. One animal study in a prestigious European journal already found "a statistically significant, dose-related increase in lymphomas and leukaemias in females" at about the equivalent level of three diet sodas per day. [1] This study was conducted on 1,800 rats and the control animals had no lymphomas.  In contrast, the animals aspartame had 10 malignant gliomas, 1 medulloblastoma and 1 malignant meningioma.  Yet somehow pro-aspartame proponents argue that this is not statistically significant!

3.  Kidney Decline.  Kidney decline is nasty, serious business and the formaldehyde from aspartame has now been linked to this condition.  Read more here at this link in the News Flash on the bottom of this page on Excitoxins.

4. Testosterone and Reproduction.  Numerous animal studies show that fetal excitotoxin exposure - excitotoxins pass rather easily through the placental barrier  - can lead to reproductive and hormonal difficulties later in life.  Read here about how Excitotoxins Can Decrease Testosterone. This may be an issue for us humans later in life, because cell phone and electrosmog exposure likely weaken our blood-brain barrier later in life.  (Excitotoxins also go largely unimpeded into the hypothlamus where they can do considerable damage as well.) 

Saccharin or Sweet 'n Low  

Supposedly, the story of saccharin is like the story of death row inmates who are found later to be innocent and then freed upon the public at large.  Many people, health conscious or not, know about how saccharin was implicated as a cause of bladder cancer in a famous rat studies of 1977-1980.  [2]  However, it didn't take long for several flaws in the study to come out, including the fact that fat metabolism is different and the dosage was much, much beyond any reasonable amount that could be consumed by a human.

Now the pendulum has swung back in the other direction and many consider saccharin the safest of the artificial sweeteners.  I would argue caution for the following reason:

1.  Liver Irritation and Toxicity.  Saccharin can be hard on the liver [3] and is known for increasing aminotransferase levels, a sign of liver damage. One study on rats showed no liver cancer when saccharin alone was given to rats.  However, when another liver-cancer causing agent was administred, saccharin greatly accelerated the rate of cancer. [4]  In other words, saccharin may simply accelerate any underlying liver problems, a very serious problem indeed in our day of chemicals and drugs, which often overtax our livers.  (In fairness, another similar study found no such toxicity. [5])  It should be noted, also, that one study showed DNA modifications from saccharin in mice. [6]

Sucralose or Splenda  

So far sucralose has avoided the spotlight as far as negative press and deservedly so: it has had, as far as I know, only one valid negative study to date: one set of researchers found that it negatively effected intestinal flora and pH. [7]  If true, this is a very serious charge indeed as "gut flora", one's good intestinal bacteria, is critical for immune function and some digestive processes. However, more work is needed as this study has received some criticism for being insufficiently rigorous.

I should mention, though, that sucralose has been cited (anecdotally) by Medscape as a possible migraine trigger. [9] This has not been verified, however, by a formal study nor do researchers know of any mechanism by which this might occur.

CAUTION:  A lot of health-conscious people are running to Stevia and Agave as natural alternatives to sugar and alternative sweeteners. Yes, they are natural in the sense that they have been consumed as foods.  The agave plant is grown in Mexico and is touted as a "low glycemic" sweetener.  The problem is that it is relatively non-sweet in taste yet almost as calorie dense as fructose syrup.  In other words, it would be very easy to pack on the pounds with agave syrup.  Furthermore, agave syrup does not contain fructose and the percentage goes up each year with increasingly modern manufacturing techniques that use higher and higher heat.  Stevia is no better:  high doses have led to decreases in testosterone and reduced sperm counts in laboratory animals. [10]

REFERENCES: