6
« on: February 01, 2017, 06:25:11 pm »
Hi All,
I'm now 32 and always had some health anxiety, I have scoliosis and my thyroid levels jump up and down, so decided to have an MRI, turns out a full body is cheaper than pituatary alone, so I went for it, here are findings. I'm actually very healthy, apart from my spine!
turns out I have a hydrocele too!
Clinical Indication:
Scoliosis.
Technique:
Sagittal T1 and T2 whole spine, Axial T2
Findings:
No previous imaging is available for comparison.
Spine alignment is normal.
Small Schmorl's node in the superior endplate of the T6 vertebral body.
No other vertebral abnormality.
The spinal cord is normal.
Mild disc degenerative changes at several levels throughout the spine.
No disc protrusion, spinal cord or cauda equina or nerve root compression.
No other significant spine abnormality.
Conclusion:
No significant spine abnormality.
Clinical Indication:
Pituitary problems.
Technique:
Axial T2, axial FLAIR, DWI, sagittal T1 brain; high resolution sagittal T2, sagittal and coronal T1
pituitary; circle of Willis MRA and MRA neck arteries.
Findings:
No previous imaging is available for comparison.
The brain is normal.
No intracranial neoplasm, hydrocephalus or features of raised intracranial pressure.
Normal craniocervical junction.
The pituitary gland is normal.
No intracranial aneurysm or other intracranial arterial abnormality.
The carotid bifurcations are normal.
The imaged sections of the extracranial vertebral and carotid arteries are normal.
Conclusion:
Normal brain and pituitary gland.
No intracranial aneurysm.
Normal carotid bifurcations.
Findings:
Liver, spleen, pancreas and adrenal glands are within normal limits.
There is no diffusion restriction.
There are no calculi in the gallbladder.
No significant biliary ductal dilatation.
There is no hydronephrosis nor significant lymph adenopathy.
Findings:
Prostate, seminal vesicles appear unremarkable.
There is no diffusion restriction.
Urinary bladder is distended.
There is no significant pelvic lymph adenopathy nor free fluid.
Mild bilateral hydrocoel is identified, partially imaged
In the stir images of the bony pelvis there is no evidence of marrow oedema to suggest an underlying
hyperactive process.
Conclusion:
Mild bilateral hydrocoel